
Sixty years ago this week, French
troops were defeated by Vietnamese forces at Dien Bien Phu. As
historian Julian Jackson explains, it was a turning point in the history
of both nations, and in the Cold War - and a battle where some in the
US appear to have contemplated the use of nuclear weapons.
"Would you like two atomic bombs?" These are the words
troops were defeated by Vietnamese forces at Dien Bien Phu. As
historian Julian Jackson explains, it was a turning point in the history
of both nations, and in the Cold War - and a battle where some in the
US appear to have contemplated the use of nuclear weapons.
that a senior French diplomat remembered US Secretary of State John
Foster Dulles asking the French Foreign Minister, Georges Bidault, in
April 1954. The context of this extraordinary offer was the critical
plight of the French army fighting the nationalist forces of Ho Chi Minh
at Dien Bien Phu in the highlands of north-west Vietnam.The battle of Dien Bien Phu is today overshadowed by the later involvement of the Americans in Vietnam in the 1960s. But for eight years between 1946 and 1954 the French had fought their own bloody war to hold on to their Empire in the Far East. After the seizure of power by the Communists in China in 1949, this colonial conflict had become a key battleground of the Cold War. The Chinese provided the Vietnamese with arms and supplies while most of the costs of the French war effort were borne by America. But it was French soldiers who were fighting and dying. By 1954, French forces in Indochina totalled over 55,000.
At the end of 1953, French commander in chief
Gen Navarre had decided to set up a fortified garrison in the valley of
Dien Bien Phu, in the highlands about 280 miles from the northern
capital of Hanoi. The valley was surrounded by rings of forested hills
and mountains. The position
was defensible providing the French could hold on to the inner hills
and keep their position supplied through the airstrip. What they
underestimated was the capacity of the Vietnamese to amass artillery
behind the hills. This equipment was transported by tens of thousands of
labourers - many of them women and children - carrying material
hundreds of miles through the jungle day and night. On 13 March the
Vietnamese unleashed a massive barrage of artillery and within two days
two of the surrounding hills had been taken, and the airstrip was no
longer usable. The French defenders were now cut off and the noose
tightened around them.
was defensible providing the French could hold on to the inner hills
and keep their position supplied through the airstrip. What they
underestimated was the capacity of the Vietnamese to amass artillery
behind the hills. This equipment was transported by tens of thousands of
labourers - many of them women and children - carrying material
hundreds of miles through the jungle day and night. On 13 March the
Vietnamese unleashed a massive barrage of artillery and within two days
two of the surrounding hills had been taken, and the airstrip was no
longer usable. The French defenders were now cut off and the noose
tightened around them.
of Staff. Also quite hawkish was the US Secretary of State John Foster
Dulles, who was obsessed by the crusade against Communism. More reserved
was President Eisenhower who nonetheless gave a press conference in
early April where he proclaimed the infamous "domino theory" about the
possible spread of Communism from one country to another.
Saturday 3 April 1954 has gone down in American history as "the day we didn't go to war". On that day Dulles met Congressional leaders who were adamant they would not support any military intervention unless Britain was also involved. Eisenhower sent a letter
to the British Prime Minister Winston Churchill warning of the
consequences for the West if Dien Bien Phu fell. It was around this
time, at a meeting in Paris, that Dulles supposedly made his astonishing
offer to the French of tactical nuclear weapons.In fact, Dulles was never authorised to make such an offer and there is no hard evidence that he did so. It seems possible that in the febrile atmosphere of those days the panic-stricken French may simply have misunderstood him. Or his words may have got lost in translation
.
.
He uttered the two fatal words 'nuclear bomb'," Maurice Schumann, a
former foreign minister, said before his death in 1998. "Bidault
immediately reacted as if he didn't take this offer seriously."According to Professor Fred Logevall of Cornell University, Dulles "at least talked in very general
terms about the possibility, what did the French think about
potentially using two or three tactical nuclear weapons against these
enemy positions".Bidault declined, he says, "because he knew… that if this killed a lot of Viet
Minh troops then it would also basically destroy the garrison itself".In the end, there was no American intervention of any kind, as the British refused to go along with it.
he last weeks of the battle of Dien Bien Phu were atrociously gruelling. The ground turned to mud once the monsoon began, and men clung to craters and ditches in conditions reminiscent
of the battle of Verdun in 1916. On 7 May 1954, after a 56-day siege,
the French army surrendered. Overall on the French side there were 1,142
dead, 1,606 disappeared, 4,500 more or less badly wounded. Vietnamese
casualties ran to 22,000.In this year marked by two other major anniversaries - the centenary of the outbreak of World War One and the 70th anniversary of D-Day - we should not forget this other battle that took place 60 years ago. In the history of decolonisation it was the only time a professional
European army was decisively defeated in a pitched battle. It marked
the end of the French Empire in the Far East, and provided an
inspiration to other anti-colonial fighters. It was no coincidence also
that a few weeks later a violent rebellion broke out in French Algeria -
the beginning of another bloody and traumatic war that was to last
eight years. The French army held so desperately on to Algeria partly to
redeem the honour it felt had been lost at Dien Bien Phu. So obsessed
did the army become by this idea that in 1958 it backed a putsch against
the government, which it believed was preparing what the generals
condemned as a "diplomatic Dien Bien Phu". This putsch brought back to
power Gen de Gaulle who set up the new presidential regime that exists
in France today. So the ripples of Dien Bien Phu are still being felt.
A memorial in Dien Bien
Phu commemorates the French soldiers who died there
Phu commemorates the French soldiers who died there
deterrent.For the Vietnamese, however, Dien Bien Phu, was only the first round. The Americans, who had refused to become directly involved in 1954, were gradually
sucked into war - the second Vietnam War - during the 1960s.http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-27243803
Warfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
ReplyDeleteYour article is very well done, a good read.