No war in history attracts more controversy and myth than World War One.
For the soldiers who fought it was in some ways better than previous conflicts, and in some ways worse.
By setting it apart as uniquely awful we are blinding ourselves to the reality of not just WW1 but war in
general
.
We are also in danger of belittling the experience of soldiers and
civilians caught up in countless other appalling conflicts throughout
history and the present day.
1. It was the bloodiest war in history to that point
F ifty years before WW1 broke out, southern China was torn apart by an
even bloodier conflict. Conservative estimates of the dead in the
14-year Taiping rebellion start at between 20 and 30 million. Around 17
million soldiers and civilians were killed during WW1.
Although
more
Britons died in WW1 than any other conflict, the bloodiest war in our
history relative to population size is the Civil War which raged in the
mid-17th Century. It saw a far higher proportion of the population of
the British Isles killed than the less than 2% who died in WW1. By
contrast around 4% of the population of England and Wales, and
considerably more than that in Scotland and Ireland, are thought to have
been killed in the Civil War.
2. Most soldiers died
In the UK around six million men were mobilised, and of those just over 700,000 were killed. That's around 11.5%.
In fact, as a British soldier you were
more
likely to die during the
Crimean War (1853-56) than in WW1.
3. Men lived in the trenches for years on end
Front-line trenches could be a terribly
hostile place to live. Often wet, cold and exposed to the enemy, units
would quickly lose their morale if they
spent
too much time in them.
As a result, the British army rotated men in and out
continuously. Between battles, a unit spent perhaps 10 days a month in
the trench
system
, and of those, rarely more than three days right up on the front line. It was not unusual to be out of the line for a month.
During moments of crisis, such as big offensives, the British could
occasionally spend up to seven days on the front line but were far more
often rotated out after just a day or two.
4. The upper class got off lightly
Although the great majority of casualties in WW1 were from the
working class, the social and political elite was hit
disproportionately hard by WW1. Their sons provided the junior officers
whose job it was to lead the way over the top and expose themselves to
the greatest danger as an example to their men.
Some 12% of the British army's ordinary soldiers were killed
during the war, compared with 17% of its officers. Eton alone lost more
than 1,000 former pupils - 20% of those who served. UK wartime Prime
Minister Herbert Asquith lost a son, while future Prime Minister Andrew
Bonar Law lost two. Anthony Eden lost two brothers, another brother of
his was terribly wounded and an uncle was captured.
5. 'Lions led by donkeys'
This saying was supposed to have come from
senior German commanders describing brave British soldiers led by
incompetent old toffs from their chateaux. In fact the incident was made
up by historian Alan Clark.
During the war
more
than 200 generals were killed, wounded or captured. Most visited the
front lines every day. In battle they were considerably closer to the
action than generals are today.
Naturally, some generals were not up to the job, but others
were brilliant, such as Arthur Currie, a middle-class Canadian failed
insurance broker and property developer.
Rarely in history have commanders had to adapt to a
more
radically different technological environment.
British commanders had been trained to fight small colonial
wars, now they were thrust into a massive industrial struggle unlike
anything the British army had ever seen.
Despite this, within three years the British had effectively invented a
method
of warfare still recognisable today. By the summer of 1918 the British
army was probably at its best ever and it inflicted crushing defeats on
the Germans.
6. Gallipoli was fought by Australians and New Zealanders
Far
more
British soldiers fought on the Gallipoli peninsula than Australians and New Zealanders put together.
The UK lost four or five times as many men in the brutal campaign as her imperial Anzac contingents. The French also lost
more
men than the Australians.
The Aussies and Kiwis commemorate Gallipoli ardently, and
understandably so, as their casualties do represent terrible losses both
as a proportion of their forces committed and of their small
populations.
7. Tactics on the Western Front
remained unchanged despite repeated failure
Never have tactics and technology changed so radically in four
years of fighting. It was a time of extraordinary innovation. In 1914
generals on horseback galloped across battlefields as men in cloth caps
charged the enemy without the necessary covering fire. Both sides were
overwhelmingly armed with rifles. Four years later, steel-helmeted
combat teams dashed forward protected by a curtain of artillery shells.
They were now armed with flame throwers, portable
machine-guns and grenades fired from rifles. Above, planes, that in 1914
would have appeared unimaginably sophisticated, duelled in the skies,
some carrying experimental wireless radio sets, reporting real-time
reconnaissance.
Huge artillery pieces fired with pinpoint accuracy - using only aerial
photos
and maths they could score a hit on the first shot. Tanks had gone from
the drawing board to the battlefield in just two years, also changing
war forever.
8. No-one won
Swathes of Europe lay wasted, millions were dead or wounded. Survivors lived on with severe
mental
trauma. The UK was broke. It is odd to talk about winning.
However, in a
narrow
military sense, the UK and her allies convincingly won. Germany's
battleships had been bottled up by the Royal Navy until their crews
mutinied rather than make a suicidal attack against the British fleet.
Germany's army collapsed as a series of mighty allied blows scythed through supposedly impregnable defences.
By late September 1918 the German emperor and his military
mastermind Erich Ludendorff admitted that there was no hope and Germany
must beg for peace. The 11 November Armistice was essentially a German
surrender.
Unlike Hitler in 1945, the German government did not insist
on a hopeless, pointless struggle until the allies were in Berlin - a
decision
that saved countless lives, but was seized upon later to claim Germany never really lost.
9. The Versailles Treaty was extremely harsh
The treaty of Versailles confiscated 10% of Germany's territory but left it the largest, richest nation in central Europe.
It was largely unoccupied and
financial
reparations were linked to its ability to pay, which mostly went unenforced anyway.
The treaty was notably less harsh than treaties that ended
the 1870-71 Franco-Prussian War and World War Two. The German victors in
the former annexed large chunks of two rich
French
provinces, part of France for between 2-300 years, and home to most of
French iron ore production, as well as presenting France with a massive
bill for immediate payment.
After WW2 Germany was occupied, split up, her factory machinery
smashed or stolen and millions of prisoners forced to stay with their
captors and work as slave labourers. Germany lost all the territory it
had gained after WW1 and another giant slice on top of that.
Versailles was not harsh but was portrayed as such by Hitler who sought to
create
a tidal wave of anti-Versailles sentiment on which he could then ride into power.
10. Everyone hated it
Like any war, it all comes down to luck. You may witness
unimaginable horrors that leave you mentally and physically
incapacitated for life, or you might get away without a scrape. It could
be the best of times, or the worst of times.
Many soldiers enjoyed WW1. If they were lucky they would avoid a big offensive, and much of the time,
conditions
might be better than at home.
For the British there was meat every day - a rare luxury back home - cigarettes, tea and rum, part of a daily
diet
of over 4,000 calories.
Absentee rates due to sickness, an important barometer of a
unit's morale were, remarkably, hardly above peacetime rates. Many young
men enjoyed the guaranteed pay, the intense comradeship, the
responsibility and a much greater sexual freedom than in peacetime
Britain.